[Discussion] the Janoshik advice in here is 20 years out of date
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: purity matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 4 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 37 people measuring the same…
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 80 weeks to accept.
This result fits the template perfectly.
Adding to this: Medutest is doing more work than the comment implies.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
Yeah, the Medutest number matching the claim is the actual signal.
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
This result fits the template perfectly.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
the 93.7% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
the 93.7% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
Adding to this: Janoshik is doing more work than the comment implies.
Slight fix: the number was 97.4, not 97.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.