GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
5.1k
c/labresults·posted 1 year ago by u/scam_taxonomy

my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether batch is why

Lab Receipts ×1 Sourced ×2 Cold Box ×2

Right, the purity question again, but with numbers this time.

I have 22 data points over 34 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.

The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 38, not week 87. People give up long before the interesting part.

Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.

5,812 up / 670 down90% upvoted64 commentsid 1rb1f730 Apr 2025

64 comments

26 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/aksel_jansen445 points·1 year ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
u/coa_janitorMOD260 points·1 year ago·edited

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyOPc/scamalerts134 points·1 year ago

Removed a chain here.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyOPc/scamalerts255 points·1 year ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_nwosu494 points·1 year ago

Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 6–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.

replysharereportpermalink
u/edit_for_clarity213 points·1 year ago·edited

template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]231 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyOPc/scamalerts381 points·1 year ago

reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_trevino214 points·1 year ago

the VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter results differ by 19 points, both inside inter-lab variance

replysharereportpermalink
u/hedda_aguirre0 points·1 year ago

QST / BPC / batch 10 / VendorInvestigate / 93.7% — that is the shape

replysharereportpermalink
u/mariam_cabrera228 points·1 year ago

reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result

replysharereportpermalink
u/gustav_cardoso125 points·1 year ago

template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (3) →
u/insulin_syringe_ian291 points·1 year ago
i do not know. that is the honest answer.
replysharereportpermalink
u/wholesome_lurker193 points·1 year ago

the 97.6% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal

replysharereportpermalink
u/usp_appendixcompendial83 points·1 year ago

Was that the vendor COA or your own test?

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_almeida102 points·1 year ago

multiple batches from Homopeptide show a spread, that is the data

replysharereportpermalink
u/ahmed_fonseca50 points·1 year ago

reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_kowalski60 points·1 year ago

multiple batches from Homopeptide show a spread, that is the data

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 4 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/asks_dumb_questions27 points·1 year ago·edited

sample of one, say so

replysharereportpermalink
u/noor_cardoso279 points·1 year ago

the 97.6% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 59 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/usp_appendixcompendial210 points·1 year ago

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

replysharereportpermalink
u/whois_wanda128 points·1 year ago

multiple batches from QST show a spread, that is the data

replysharereportpermalink
u/marisol_moreau41 points·1 year ago

multiple batches from WWB show a spread, that is the data

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.