GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether batch is why — 64 comments in the full submission. View in context.
5.1k
c/labresults·submitted 1 year ago by u/scam_taxonomy

my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether batch is why

Labbranch of 10 comments

Right, the purity question again, but with numbers this time. I have 22 data points over 34 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing…

Read the full submission and all 64 comments →

This branch

10 comments, started 1 year ago
u/wholesome_lurker193 points·1 year ago

the 97.6% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal

replysharereportpermalink
u/usp_appendixcompendial83 points·1 year ago

Was that the vendor COA or your own test?

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_almeida102 points·1 year ago

multiple batches from Homopeptide show a spread, that is the data

replysharereportpermalink
u/ahmed_fonseca50 points·1 year ago

reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_kowalski60 points·1 year ago

multiple batches from Homopeptide show a spread, that is the data

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 4 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/asks_dumb_questions27 points·1 year ago·edited

sample of one, say so

replysharereportpermalink
u/noor_cardoso279 points·1 year ago

the 97.6% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 59 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/usp_appendixcompendial210 points·1 year ago

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

replysharereportpermalink
u/whois_wanda128 points·1 year ago

multiple batches from QST show a spread, that is the data

replysharereportpermalink
u/marisol_moreau41 points·1 year ago

multiple batches from WWB show a spread, that is the data

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.