GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
4.4k
c/labresults·posted 9 months ago by u/yannick_barros

[Vendor] QST order #23 — Canada, 13 days, no drama, receipts inside

Lab Well Actually ×2 Cold Box ×1 Slow Clap ×1

Right, the Janoshik question again, but with numbers this time.

I have 23 data points over 30 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.

The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 91, not week 45. People give up long before the interesting part.

Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.

5,579 up / 1,182 down83% upvoted27 commentsid q4cd8t24 Oct 2025

27 comments

9 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/plateau_patrol512 points·9 months ago

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

replysharereportpermalink
u/coring_the_stopper494 points·9 months ago

Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.

replysharereportpermalink
u/fatima_wojcik382 points·9 months ago

This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yannick_barrosOP139 points·9 months ago

The Janoshik result at 98.9% was below the 99.2% claim. QST retested at their cost and came back 98.9%. Logged as resolved.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (5) →
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.