[Results] 91 weeks on 0.25mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring
Been lurking in c/survodutide for about 4 months and finally have something worth posting.
Short version: week 43, 2.5mg, and Janoshik is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 39 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle.
What I actually want to know is whether the people saying it does not matter have measured it, or whether it is just repeated confidently. Happy to be told I am overthinking this — I probably am — but I would rather overthink it now than at week 49.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Yeah, the Janoshik number matching the claim is the actual signal.
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
Mechanistically the bit that matters is below spec. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
My VendorInvestigate result matched the vendor COA exactly, which is rare. KP deserves that note in the directory.
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
The Janoshik result at 98.0% was below the 98.1% claim. SSA retested at their cost and came back 98.0%. Logged as resolved.
sample of one, say so
Not to be pedantic but batch and PeptideMeter are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Not to be pedantic but batch and PeptideMeter are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
inter-lab variance is real, 14 points is inside normal
Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 94.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
My Janoshik result matched the vendor COA exactly, which is rare. JEEP deserves that note in the directory.
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
multiple batches from KP show a spread, that is the data
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
Yeah, the PeptideMeter number matching the claim is the actual signal.
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
I am going to push back on this slightly.
- 1The Janoshik result at 98.0% was below the 98.1% claim. SSA retested at…7 comments in this branch · started by u/refund_ledger
- 2Mechanistically the bit that matters is below spec. It explains most of the…4 comments in this branch · started by u/noor_vermeulen