GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Results] 91 weeks on 0.25mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring — 58 comments in the full submission. View in context.
5k
c/labresults·submitted 2 years ago by u/jarno_cabrera

[Results] 91 weeks on 0.25mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring

Labbranch of 7 comments

Been lurking in c/survodutide for about 4 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 43, 2.5mg, and Janoshik is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 39 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle. What I actually want to know…

Read the full submission and all 58 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 2 years ago
u/refund_ledger412 points·2 years ago

The Janoshik result at 98.0% was below the 98.1% claim. SSA retested at their cost and came back 98.0%. Logged as resolved.

replysharereportpermalink
u/diego_szabo275 points·2 years ago

sample of one, say so

replysharereportpermalink
u/tuva_kirchner142 points·2 years ago

Not to be pedantic but batch and PeptideMeter are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

replysharereportpermalink
u/jarno_cabreraOP73 points·2 years ago

Not to be pedantic but batch and PeptideMeter are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
u/piotr_nascimento118 points·2 years ago

inter-lab variance is real, 14 points is inside normal

replysharereportpermalink
u/elise_ramos87 points·2 years ago

Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 94.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nayeli_iyer118 points·2 years ago

My Janoshik result matched the vendor COA exactly, which is rare. JEEP deserves that note in the directory.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.