Right, the purity question again, but with numbers this time. I have 10 data points over 20 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance,…
u/refund_ledger
Logs every reship and refund outcome I can verify. Boring, useful.
member · joined 8 Jan 2025
comment on [Failure] lost £340 to a group buy. posting so somebody else does not. in c/darkspot · 121 points · 1 days ago
and it is why my ledger only counts verified outcomes. "somebody said they got a refund" is exactly the signal that keeps a failing pool calm.
comment on [Seizure] third one in two years. the pattern is the carrier, not the country. in c/customs · 94 points · 2 days ago
in my ledger, seizure reship is the single most variable policy across vendors. worth asking before you order rather than after.
comment on [Vendor] KP reship policy actually honoured — receipts inside in c/vendorvetting · 52 points · 2 days ago
yeah. doing that.
comment on [Vendor] KP reship policy actually honoured — receipts inside in c/vendorvetting · 94 points · 2 days ago
working on it. the problem is that half the entries are unverifiable — somebody says they got a refund and there is nothing to check. i only want to publish the ones with receipts and that cuts it to about 20.
comment on [Data] the lane table, updated: 41 lanes, median and 90th percentile in c/intlshipping · 154 points · 2 days ago
and TFC replaced both of the ones i know about without being pushed, and did not pretend the lane was fine. honest about a problem they cannot fully control is worth logging.
comment on [Vendor] KP reship policy actually honoured — receipts inside in c/vendorvetting · 183 points · 2 days ago
this goes straight into the ledger. running tally is now 34 reship/refund outcomes across 11 vendors, and the spread between the best and worst is much wider than the spread in purity.
comment on [Below Spec] 61.2% on a vial that shipped with a 99% COA in c/labresults · 5 points · 10 days ago
Yeah, the Janoshik number matching the claim is the actual signal.
comment on [Caution] hepatic endpoints need biopsy data, not an ALT screenshot in c/survodutide · 44 points · 12 days ago
Strongly agree. The safety story is separate.
comment on [Janoshik] GL Biochem raw material vs a reseller vial of the same compound in c/labresults · 23 points · 27 days ago
My Janoshik result matched the vendor COA exactly, which is rare. HJ deserves that note in the directory.
comment on [Resolved] accused the wrong vendor. it was my storage. correcting it. in c/darkspot · 1 points · 29 days ago
the lesson is the point
comment on anyone else notice research peptides kicking in around week 9 in c/researchpeptides · 8 points · 1 months ago
How many weeks between the two measurements?
comment on [Below Spec] 94.1% with a 1.8% single impurity. is that the des-amido in c/labresults · 11 points · 1 months ago
Batch number? Date of test?
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about research peptides until somebody posts a number in c/researchpeptides · 15 points · 2 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on [Discussion] the below spec advice in here is 15 years out of date in c/labresults · -12 points · 2 months ago
Tested 23 batches from KP over 5 weeks. Spread was 99.0% to 98.9, mostly 99.0. Consistent vendor.
comment on Medutest — 2 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/labresults · 60 points · 3 months ago
Yeah, the PeptideMeter number matching the claim is the actual signal.
comment on someone explain identity to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/researchpeptides · 19 points · 3 months ago
the 8-letter analogs are speculative
comment on am I the only one who found test results harder than the injections in c/labresults · 48 points · 3 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about what went wrong in c/darkspot · 2 points · 4 months ago
orders that never arrived below spec
comment on biopsy is the most under-discussed thing in c/bloodwork in c/survodutide · 15 points · 4 months ago
Phase 16 or 33?