233
[Question] creatine while eating 1,400 calories — worth it
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking lean mass against eGFR for 19 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker…
u/matias_falk
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Hyderabad.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
7,080post karma
5,493comment karma
4submissions
57comments
comment on went too fast on reta and my resting HR told me before i noticed in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 1 days ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on the glucagon arm is why the appetite effect feels different in c/retatrutide · 141 points · 5 days ago
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
comment on [Janoshik] WWB sema 10mg — 98.6%, batch and method inside in c/labresults · 16 points · 8 days ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on how many independent tests before you trust a vendor. my number is three in c/vendorvetting · 42 points · 9 days ago
the PeptideMeter result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
comment on [Question] why is reta purity testing so much more variable between labs in c/retatrutide · 12 points · 10 days ago
the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy
comment on came off reta after 14 weeks. here is the honest version. in c/retatrutide · 3 points · 11 days ago
the 5mg arm is different from 0.25mg, results do not transfer
comment on why does nobody talk about TRIUMPH in c/retatrutide · 11 points · 27 days ago
Dose escalation on retatrutide is steeper and faster than on semaglutide. Do not assume the titration patterns transfer.
comment on why does nobody talk about TRIUMPH in c/retatrutide · 13 points · 27 days ago
retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions
384
why does nobody talk about TRIUMPH
Week 53 update. 34kg down from the start, reflux basically gone since about week 93. Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to.…
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring retatrutide at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/retatrutide · 8 points · 1 months ago
retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions
comment on [Needs Source] "lab tested" with no lab named is not a claim in c/vendorvetting · 43 points · 1 months ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with Janoshik, not with what you concluded.
comment on [Lab] four vendors, same compound, same week, one test each in c/labresults · 5 points · 1 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on [Vendor] HJ — small operation, honest about lead times, that is worth something in c/vendorvetting · 6 points · 1 months ago
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
comment on the glucagon question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 1 months ago
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
comment on the glucagon question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 57 points · 1 months ago
the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #24 — Germany, 21 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/retatrutide · 25 points · 2 months ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Question] DEXA — what am I missing here in c/glp1muscle · 1 points · 2 months ago
resistance training is protein not optional
comment on switched from 15mg to 12.5mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/vendorvetting · 59 points · 2 months ago
no
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 58 weeks to accept.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for reship posts in c/vendorvetting · 49 points · 3 months ago
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.