94
[Medutest] split one vial across two services, results within 0.9%
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: below spec matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides…
u/jonas_cardoso
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Kuopio.
member · joined 14 May 2025
3,439post karma
4,653comment karma
3submissions
84comments
comment on [PCOS] insulin resistance, cycles, and the thing that finally worked in c/glp1women · 5 points · 3 days ago
i wish i had read this 20 months ago
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Question] eGFR dropped 8 points during rapid loss, should i worry in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 3 days ago
HOMA-IR is crude but free and useful for tracking
comment on [Log] week 78, dose, weight, waist, sides, labs. nothing hidden. in c/dosinglogs · 57 points · 4 days ago
Crossposting this to c/bloodwork because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on [Seizure] third one in two years. the pattern is the carrier, not the country. in c/customs · 1 points · 9 days ago
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 18–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
comment on [Medutest] split one vial across two services, results within 0.9% in c/labresults · 8 points · 11 days ago
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
comment on [Medutest] split one vial across two services, results within 0.9% in c/labresults · 2 points · 11 days ago
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
comment on [Log] spreadsheet gremlin, 61 tabs, here is the summary sheet in c/dosinglogs · 1 points · 14 days ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on [Question] hair shedding — is it the drug or the deficit in c/glp1women · 23 points · 18 days ago
Strongly agree. Cycle changes are documented.
comment on lipids got worse on paper while everything else got better. triglycerides explain it. in c/bloodwork · 38 points · 19 days ago
search before post, but also, welcome
comment on [Question] does anyone have a straight answer on transit vs destination liability in c/customs · 16 points · 19 days ago
always state your country, advice from another jurisdiction can harm you
comment on [Question] private prescription — what am I missing here in c/glp1uk · 16 points · 23 days ago
the tier 3 pathway is the only free route, it is slow
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 60 weeks to accept.
comment on [Janoshik] GL Biochem raw material vs a reseller vial of the same compound in c/labresults · 2 points · 26 days ago
Yeah, the Janoshik number matching the claim is the actual signal.
comment on [Discussion] the ferritin advice in here is 19 years out of date in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 1 months ago
eGFR noise on rapid loss is real. 18 week noise, 14 week trend. Do not panic at week 18.
comment on [Discussion] the ferritin advice in here is 19 years out of date in c/bloodwork · 26 points · 1 months ago
Ferritin tanked from 23 to 13. Small appetite, reduced iron intake, nobody was testing it until I asked.
1.3k
[Discussion] the ferritin advice in here is 19 years out of date
I have had 19 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe. Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied…
comment on reading pricing threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/glp1uk · 35 points · 1 months ago
came here to say exactly this
comment on is it normal to get early fullness at week 94 in c/glp1women · 2 points · 1 months ago
[deleted]
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on help me understand A1c, I have read the wiki twice in c/bloodwork · 108 points · 1 months ago
This is correct. ApoB is the better marker.
comment on the weight thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/dosinglogs · 1 points · 1 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.