38
someone explain log to me like I have not read a paper in years
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: dose history matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both…
u/emil_agyeman
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Rosario.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
11,598post karma
12,926comment karma
6submissions
162comments
comment on [Lab] two reta batches, two services, 98.4% and 97.9% in c/retatrutide · 2 points · 2 days ago
triple agonism is glucagon, do not generalise
comment on ApoB over LDL-C and i will keep saying it in c/bloodwork · 2 points · 2 days ago
HOMA-IR is crude but free and useful for tracking
comment on [Stats] relative risk reduction sells papers, absolute risk reduction makes decisions in c/trialwatch · 32 points · 3 days ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on [Update] week 44 — first stall in eleven months in c/dosinglogs · -20 points · 4 days ago
include dose and date on every update
comment on [Update] week 44 — first stall in eleven months in c/dosinglogs · 37 points · 4 days ago
Small correction: the trial was 7 weeks, not 3. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [Trial Data] TRIUMPH timeline — what we actually know vs what gets repeated in c/retatrutide · 178 points · 5 days ago
retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions
comment on [Explainer] area% is not mass% and here is exactly why it matters in c/coa · 5 points · 6 days ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
comment on [Lab] first independent cagrilintide purity number i have seen in c/cagrilintide · 5 points · 6 days ago
Rodent or human data?
comment on A1c 9.1 → 5.4 over 14 months, full table inside in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 7 days ago
What are your reference ranges?
comment on water content is on the COA and everyone skips it in c/coa · -10 points · 9 days ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with related substances, not with what you concluded.
comment on [Question] why is reta purity testing so much more variable between labs in c/retatrutide · 6 points · 9 days ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 20 weeks to accept.
comment on [Lane Report] Tianjin → Canada, 14 days, two of three vials cracked in c/intlshipping · 23 points · 17 days ago
Strongly agree. Customs adds unpredictable delay.
comment on [Lane Report] Tianjin → Canada, 14 days, two of three vials cracked in c/intlshipping · 162 points · 18 days ago
transit time variance is the story, not the average
comment on [Lab] my running table: 34 tests, 11 vendors, three years in c/labresults · 11 points · 18 days ago
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
comment on [Discussion] oral GLP-1 is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/orforglipron · 10 points · 22 days ago
This is correct. ATTAIN data is phase 2.
comment on [Discussion] oral GLP-1 is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/orforglipron · 32 points · 22 days ago
the absorption problem is solved by non-peptide structure
comment on [Update] week 30, appetite returning, dose unchanged, weight flat in c/dosinglogs · 9 points · 24 days ago
the boring consistency is the point
comment on bloodwork — my 22-week log, condensed into one table in c/bloodwork · 62 points · 26 days ago
My ALT went from 9 to 12 in 29 weeks. The eGFR story shows up in the trend, not the single number.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about EMS in c/intlshipping · 152 points · 29 days ago
lane reports need origin, destination, carrier, actual transit days