GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
4.1k
c/glp1women·posted 1 year ago by u/rui_only_ro

week 56 check-in — 6kg down, constipation manageable, one thing confusing me

Results Cold Box ×3 The Quiet One ×1 Well Actually ×2

Right, the fertility question again, but with numbers this time.

I have 16 data points over 4 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.

The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 58, not week 12. People give up long before the interesting part.

Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.

4,321 up / 241 down95% upvoted66 commentsid 3airll3 Oct 2024

66 comments

30 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/elin_lindqvist783 points·1 year ago
i wish i had read this 15 months ago
replysharereportpermalink
u/nora_oyelaran209 points·1 year ago

the cycle tracking data matters, keep it private

replysharereportpermalink
u/wholesome_lurker139 points·1 year ago·edited

the cycle tracking data matters, keep it private

Adding to this: fertility is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/low_appetite_lisa39 points·1 year ago

hair-loss on contraception is real

replysharereportpermalink
u/kenji_demir0 points·1 year ago

pregnancy and trying-to-conceive get clinician pointer, not community advice

replysharereportpermalink
u/dilara_szabo1 point·1 year ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/reads_the_wiki1 point·1 year ago

Genuine question — what concentration were you at?

replysharereportpermalink
u/foam_head_fred417 points·1 year ago

perimenopause and menopause weight physiology

replysharereportpermalink
u/bastian_eriksen292 points·1 year ago

How many weeks between the two measurements?

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]209 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/rui_only_roOP154 points·1 year ago

fertility signal is there but unclear

replysharereportpermalink
u/step_therapy_s-23 points·1 year ago

contraception interaction claims need citation

replysharereportpermalink
u/wholesome_lurker1 point·1 year ago

Did anything else change in the same window?

replysharereportpermalink
u/samir_falk243 points·1 year ago

Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kaia_fonseca191 points·1 year ago

How many weeks between the two measurements?

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (2) →
u/rasmus_petrescu181 points·1 year ago

Yeah, insulin resistance is under-researched.

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_weiss58 points·1 year ago

the trials mostly studied men, insulin resistance skipped

replysharereportpermalink
u/cesar_oyelaran45 points·1 year ago

the trials mostly studied men, insulin resistance skipped

Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_chukwu15 points·1 year ago

Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/viktor_erdogan76 points·1 year ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lukas_vermeulen53 points·1 year ago

perimenopause and menopause weight physiology

replysharereportpermalink
u/cesar_oyelaran140 points·1 year ago

Strongly agree. Cycle changes are documented.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tired_ledger_ftw47 points·1 year ago

You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.

replysharereportpermalink
u/usp_appendixcompendial76 points·1 year ago

Yeah, contraception is under-researched.

replysharereportpermalink
u/mateusz_mensah122 points·1 year ago
oh thank god it is not just me
replysharereportpermalink
u/viktor_erdogan92 points·1 year ago

Yeah, contraception is under-researched.

replysharereportpermalink
u/niels_roos75 points·1 year ago

hormonal contraception interactions are speculative

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/glp1women

The questions the trials under-powered: PCOS and insulin resistance, cycle changes, fertility signal and contraception interactions, perimenopause and menopause weight physiology, and the fact that the pregnancy answer is always "not while trying, talk to your clinician".

48kmembers
62submissions
Jul 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/glp1women rules
  1. Pregnancy and trying-to-conceive questions get a clinician pointer, not community advice.
  2. Contraception interaction claims need a citation.
  3. No cycle-tracking data with identifying details.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.