1.1k
[Vendor] WXT order #6 — the Netherlands, 31 days, no drama, receipts inside
Been lurking in c/hplc for about 3 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 38, 2.4mg, and hazard ratio is the bit I still cannot get a…
u/foam_head_fred
Foam is denatured protein. If it foams you shook it.
member · joined 8 Oct 2024
7,145post karma
5,101comment karma
3submissions
56comments
comment on [Press Release] new phase 3 numbers, no publication yet, calm down in c/trialwatch · 3 points · 7 days ago
absolute risk reduction, not relative risk reduction, that is how you decide
comment on [Press Release] new phase 3 numbers, no publication yet, calm down in c/trialwatch · 2 points · 7 days ago
number-needed-to-treat is the house dialect
comment on [PSA] "we are the manufacturer" plus a Gmail address is the whole tell in c/scamalerts · 3 points · 16 days ago
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
comment on why does nobody talk about hazard ratio in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 1 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on [Confirmed] site copied our own wiki text word for word to look legitimate in c/scamalerts · -22 points · 1 months ago
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
comment on [Confirmed] site copied our own wiki text word for word to look legitimate in c/scamalerts · 46 points · 1 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #6 — Denmark, 5 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/trialwatch · 5 points · 1 months ago
the relative risk reduction in headlines is not the whole story
comment on [Lab] 14th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/trialwatch · 4 points · 1 months ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on the water content question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/coa · 55 points · 1 months ago
axis labels included, always
comment on the water content question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/coa · 95 points · 1 months ago
i have this exact spreadsheet
comment on the cloned site question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/scamalerts · 31 points · 1 months ago
Can you post the PeptideMeter result that shows the problem?
comment on help me understand FLOW, I have read the wiki twice in c/trialwatch · 8 points · 2 months ago
the discontinuation arms are the interesting part, not the STEP endpoints
comment on Germany: water content, and what it actually costs here in c/coa · 7 points · 2 months ago
This is the correct framing. The COA structure matters as much as the number.
comment on [Results] 42 weeks, 21kg, and purity was the hard part in c/coa · 709 points · 3 months ago
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #6 — the Netherlands, 31 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/trialwatch · 63 points · 6 months ago
off-label use data is different from approved-indication data
comment on [Lab] SGN BPC — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2% in c/coa · 1.1k points · 6 months ago
it is in the wiki actually
comment on stalled for 22 weeks at 1.0mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · 155 points · 6 months ago
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
comment on genuine question about SELECT that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/trialwatch · 5 points · 6 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on [Meta] the certificate of analysis rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/coa · 30 points · 7 months ago
This is the correct framing. The COA structure matters as much as the number.