GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of week 56 check-in — 6kg down, constipation manageable, one thing confusing me — 66 comments in the full submission. View in context.
4.1k
c/glp1women·submitted 1 year ago by u/rui_only_ro

week 56 check-in — 6kg down, constipation manageable, one thing confusing me

Resultsbranch of 9 comments

Right, the fertility question again, but with numbers this time. I have 16 data points over 4 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am…

Read the full submission and all 66 comments →

This branch

9 comments, started 1 year ago
u/rasmus_petrescu181 points·1 year ago

Yeah, insulin resistance is under-researched.

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_weiss58 points·1 year ago

the trials mostly studied men, insulin resistance skipped

replysharereportpermalink
u/cesar_oyelaran45 points·1 year ago

the trials mostly studied men, insulin resistance skipped

Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_chukwu15 points·1 year ago

Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/viktor_erdogan76 points·1 year ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lukas_vermeulen53 points·1 year ago

perimenopause and menopause weight physiology

replysharereportpermalink
u/cesar_oyelaran140 points·1 year ago

Strongly agree. Cycle changes are documented.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tired_ledger_ftw47 points·1 year ago

You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.

replysharereportpermalink
u/usp_appendixcompendial76 points·1 year ago

Yeah, contraception is under-researched.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/glp1women

The questions the trials under-powered: PCOS and insulin resistance, cycle changes, fertility signal and contraception interactions, perimenopause and menopause weight physiology, and the fact that the pregnancy answer is always "not while trying, talk to your clinician".

48kmembers
62submissions
Jul 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/glp1women rules
  1. Pregnancy and trying-to-conceive questions get a clinician pointer, not community advice.
  2. Contraception interaction claims need a citation.
  3. No cycle-tracking data with identifying details.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.