1.7k
[Discussion] Janoshik is doing more work than we give it credit for
Janoshik. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/orforglipron is downstream of it. Titration speed, early fullness, the…
u/lukas_vermeulen
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Oulu.
member · joined 16 Jul 2025
5,702post karma
3,093comment karma
4submissions
63comments
comment on [Below Spec] 61.2% on a vial that shipped with a 99% COA in c/labresults · 1 points · 9 days ago
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
comment on switched from compounded to brand and the titration reset itself in c/compounding · 1 points · 19 days ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on [Caution] not approved anywhere. keep posts descriptive. in c/cagrilintide · 14 points · 21 days ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Below Spec] 88% is not "basically fine" and i am tired of that reply in c/labresults · 26 points · 23 days ago
KP / BPC / batch 5 / Janoshik / 98.9% — that is the shape
comment on tried telehealth for 15 weeks. here is what happened. in c/compounding · 44 points · 1 months ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on [Lab] SSA survo — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 98.3% in c/compounding · 4 points · 1 months ago
Which state? Rules vary.
comment on [Below Spec] 94.1% with a 1.8% single impurity. is that the des-amido in c/labresults · 7 points · 1 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 96.2, not 96.8. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on [PSA] batch is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/labresults · 14 points · 2 months ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
comment on [Discussion] Janoshik is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/labresults · 82 points · 2 months ago
CPC claimed 98.1%, PeptideMeter came back 98.0%. 24 points is inter-lab variance, no drama.
comment on [Discussion] Janoshik is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/labresults · 101 points · 2 months ago
Tested 4 batches from SWB over 74 weeks. Spread was 97.9% to 97.2, mostly 97.9. Consistent vendor.
comment on anyone else notice lost money kicking in around week 80 in c/darkspot · 0 points · 2 months ago
orders that never arrived below spec
comment on [Results] 31 weeks on 5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/compounding · 6 points · 2 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on [PSA] REDEFINE is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/cagrilintide · 9 points · 3 months ago
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
comment on test results — 23 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/labresults · 5 points · 3 months ago
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
comment on test results — 23 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/labresults · 6 points · 3 months ago
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
comment on test results — 23 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/labresults · 4 points · 3 months ago
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
comment on [Question] PeptideMeter — what am I missing here in c/labresults · 0 points · 3 months ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on the co-agonism question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/cagrilintide · 45 points · 4 months ago
REDEFINE readouts are phase 8 data
comment on compounding: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/compounding · 26 points · 4 months ago
Which state? Rules vary.