[Results] 46 weeks on 1.7mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring
I have had 21 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 18 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 97.9% against a claimed 94.2%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
Not to be pedantic but satiety and amylin are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Are we talking amylin or GLP-1 here?
long-acting amylin is co-agonism, different satiety profile
not approved anywhere, keep posts descriptive, not instructional
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
[removed by moderator]
[removed by moderator]
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
CagriSema ratios in trials are fixed, do not extrapolate self-mixing
Yeah, amylin is doing different work than GLP-1.
Strongly agree. REDEFINE is phase 8, not final.
the mechanism is different, the side effect profile reflects it
the amylin agonist pool is small, community is amylin
the amylin agonist pool is small, community is amylin
Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 99.2% on the same vial is normal.
amylin is not a GLP-1, posts conflating them get corrected
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
This is correct. The co-agonism is real.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
not approved anywhere, keep posts descriptive, not instructional
Are we talking amylin or GLP-1 here?
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
REDEFINE which arm?
This is correct. The co-agonism is real.
the co-agonism question is real and interesting
This is correct. The co-agonism is real.
the mechanism is different, the side effect profile reflects it
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
Not to be pedantic but co-agonism and satiety are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
- 1This is correct. The co-agonism is real.9 comments in this branch · started by u/milos_vestergaard
- 2This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please…8 comments in this branch · started by u/ledger_mod