2.6k
[Results] 7 weeks, 25kg, and Medutest was the hard part
Right, the batch question again, but with numbers this time. I have 7 data points over 14 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and…
u/rina_sobczak
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Enugu.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
5,163post karma
3,489comment karma
2submissions
65comments
Overview — page 3 of 4
comment on [Question] perimenopause — what am I missing here in c/glp1women · 36 points · 1 year ago
perimenopause and menopause weight physiology
comment on does FLOW actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 1 year ago
give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body
comment on three years of REDEFINE threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/cagrilintide · 8 points · 1 year ago
REDEFINE readouts are phase 13 data
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about compounding in c/compounding · 35 points · 1 year ago
telehealth prescriber models exist, pricing differs by state
comment on [Discussion] the Janoshik advice in here is 20 years out of date in c/labresults · 79 points · 1 year ago
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 80 weeks to accept.
comment on [Discussion] the Janoshik advice in here is 20 years out of date in c/labresults · 179 points · 1 year ago
the VendorInvestigate and Medutest results differ by 19 points, both inside inter-lab variance
comment on [Discussion] the endpoint advice in here is 5 years out of date in c/trialwatch · 6 points · 1 year ago
off-label use data is different from approved-indication data
comment on 6 months in and shortage list is still the thing I get wrong in c/compounding · 125 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, 503A and 503B are different regulatory animals.
comment on [Discussion] the endpoint advice in here is 5 years out of date in c/trialwatch · 23 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Phase 2 is investigational, not conclusive.
comment on Germany: contraception, and what it actually costs here in c/glp1women · 7 points · 1 year ago
Disagree.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Discussion] the purity advice in here is 8 years out of date in c/labresults · 3 points · 1 year ago
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
comment on tried CagriSema for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/cagrilintide · 6 points · 1 year ago
Small correction: the trial was 8 weeks, not 5. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on my TSH moved and I cannot work out whether API source is why in c/compounding · 420 points · 1 year ago
the shortage list is temporary, it ends and compounding becomes illegal again
comment on [Results] 62 weeks, 41kg, and batch was the hard part in c/labresults · 182 points · 1 year ago
multiple batches from WWB show a spread, that is the data
comment on insulin resistance — 21 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/glp1women · 7 points · 1 year ago
Not to be pedantic but fertility and cycle are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on insulin resistance — 21 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/glp1women · 89 points · 1 year ago
contraception interaction claims need citation
comment on small win: satiety stopped being a problem at week 25 in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 1 year ago
Rodent or human data?
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for STEP posts in c/trialwatch · 102 points · 2 years ago
give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body
comment on reading FLOW threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/trialwatch · 6 points · 2 years ago
the 15 week readout is different from the 40 week readout