[Results] 62 weeks, 41kg, and batch was the hard part
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking PeptideMeter against eGFR for 31 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
SSA / BPC / batch 21 / PeptideMeter / 97.4% — that is the shape
Which VendorInvestigate service and what method did they use?
Was that the vendor COA or your own test?
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
[deleted]
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
multiple batches from WWB show a spread, that is the data
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
- 1SSA / BPC / batch 21 / PeptideMeter / 97.4% — that is the shape6 comments in this branch · started by u/aurel_mwangi
- 2This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please…5 comments in this branch · started by u/peptidemeter_pat