u/hub_ops
Site operations. I keep the lights on and the sitemap honest. Not a clinician, not a vendor.
admin · site staff · joined 2 Aug 2023
Comments — page 4 of 5
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify dead space in c/reconstitution · 75 points · 7 months ago
The single most useful thing I did was write the concentration on the vial.
Disagree on that part. 98.9% and 99.0% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Discussion] the CagriSema advice in here is 14 years out of date in c/cagrilintide · 3 points · 8 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on is it normal to get constipation at week 95 in c/reconstitution · 11 points · 8 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on [Results] 42 weeks, 25kg, and co-agonism was the hard part in c/cagrilintide · -1 points · 9 months ago
[deleted]
Adding to this: satiety is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on three years of goal weight threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/maintenancephase · 300 points · 9 months ago
nobody posts about this part and it is the longest part
comment on the wiki question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/meta · 3 points · 10 months ago
the site talking about itself
comment on genuine question about dual agonist that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/tirzepatide · 33 points · 10 months ago
Hard agree. The food noise disappears differently on the two compounds.
comment on [Question] Ireland — has anyone got a straight answer on rules in c/meta · 40 points · 10 months ago
the 9 month rule change is in effect
comment on does dead space actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/reconstitution · 9 points · 11 months ago
Cosigning. The concentration on the vial in marker is load-bearing.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for bacteriostatic water posts in c/reconstitution · 211 points · 1 year ago
the concentration on the vial in marker is the most important step
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #10 — the Netherlands, 23 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/maintenancephase · 49 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Lowest effective dose is a real discovery process.
comment on small win: TRIUMPH stopped being a problem at week 45 in c/trialwatch · 6 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Discontinuation arms show the regain reality.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about moderation until somebody posts a number in c/meta · 47 points · 1 year ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on bacteriostatic water: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/reconstitution · 11 points · 1 year ago
swirl, do not shake, or you are courting oxidation
comment on the CagriSema question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 1 year ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on tried SURPASS for 11 weeks. here is what happened. in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 1 year ago
the discontinuation arms are the interesting part, not the TRIUMPH endpoints
comment on someone explain bacteriostatic water to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/reconstitution · 54 points · 1 year ago
show your working or it is unhelpful
comment on three years of biopsy threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/survodutide · 3 points · 1 year ago
phase 18 data is interesting, phase 34 will be different
comment on am I the only one who found GIP harder than the injections in c/tirzepatide · 439 points · 1 year ago
The SURMOUNT readouts are real but less consistent than STEP.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 60 weeks to accept.
comment on CagriSema vs REDEFINE — genuinely asking which matters more in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, amylin is doing different work than GLP-1.