GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
851
c/meta·posted 1 year ago by u/rekha_mwangi

[Discussion] can we stop arguing about moderation until somebody posts a number

Discussion Long Haul ×2

Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.

Setup: 10mg, week 81, injection-site soreness present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — disclosure — and tracked it for 15 weeks.

Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.

Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.

1,078 up / 227 down83% upvoted36 commentsid 19qq6b12 Jul 2025

36 comments

21 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/dizzy_on_standing73 points·1 year ago

the 17 month rule change is in effect

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]52 points·1 year ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/ines_boateng42 points·1 year ago

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/farid_jansen71 points·1 year ago

the evidence standards are disclosure

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_sandvik84 points·1 year ago

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/wanjiru_osei0 points·1 year ago

rule-change proposals need concrete wording

replysharereportpermalink
u/rekha_mwangiOP65 points·1 year ago

Strongly agree. Transparency wins.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hub_opsMOD47 points·1 year ago

Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hassan_castellanos32 points·1 year ago

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kenji_demir10 points·1 year ago

the ranking formula is meta

replysharereportpermalink
u/dose_creep_dan13 points·1 year ago

I am going to push back on this slightly.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yusuf_achebe-10 points·1 year ago

Strongly agree. Transparency wins.

replysharereportpermalink
u/quiet_moderatormod1 point·1 year ago

the periodic argument about wiki standards

replysharereportpermalink
u/lucia_balogun5 points·1 year ago

moderation appeals go through modmail first

replysharereportpermalink
u/marit_mwangi3 points·1 year ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/vikram_mbeki19 points·1 year ago

Retitled to remove editorialising.

Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rekha_mwangiOP14 points·1 year ago

sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_petrescu27 points·1 year ago

rules, moderation, ranking, wiki

replysharereportpermalink
u/ewan_marchand30 points·1 year ago

My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rekha_mwangiOP12 points·1 year ago

New Zealand here. Waited 19 months on a list, gave up, went private, and the total cost was roughly what I expected.

replysharereportpermalink
u/stablecoin_steve15 points·1 year ago

How many weeks between the two measurements?

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.