anyone else notice wiki kicking in around week 29
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 0.5mg, week 71, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — ranking — and tracked it for 2 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Did anything else change in the same window?
This is correct. Modmail first.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
the 21 month rule change is in effect
This is correct.
Disagree on that part. 96.8% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.
This is correct. Modmail first.
Slight fix: the number was 98.3, not 98.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
- 1This is correct. Modmail first.9 comments in this branch · started by u/andres_dahlberg
- 2Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different…4 comments in this branch · started by u/naomi_erdogan