u/dario_ibarra
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Aarhus.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
comment on [Announcement] c/labresults now requires the standard template in c/meta · 1 points · 3 days ago
Yeah, the evidence standard works.
comment on [Vendor] KP reship policy actually honoured — receipts inside in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 4 days ago
order date, product, and what was tested.
Adding to this: VendorInvestigate is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on domain registered eleven days ago, 400 five-star reviews. sure in c/vendorvetting · 7 points · 20 days ago
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
comment on [Meta] the moderation rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/meta · 88 points · 2 months ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for reship posts in c/vendorvetting · 15 points · 3 months ago
the batch number or it did not happen
comment on the meta question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/meta · 1 points · 3 months ago
How many weeks between the two measurements?
comment on genuine question about Medutest that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/vendorvetting · 21 points · 4 months ago
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
comment on VendorInvestigate is the most under-discussed thing in c/bpc157 in c/vendorvetting · 475 points · 6 months ago
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
comment on someone explain vendor to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/vendorvetting · 126 points · 7 months ago
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
comment on meta — my 21-week log, condensed into one table in c/meta · 2 points · 1 year ago
sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly
comment on France: meta, and what it actually costs here in c/meta · 21 points · 1 year ago
the ranking formula is wiki
comment on PeptideMeter — my 17-week log, condensed into one table in c/vendorvetting · 48 points · 1 year ago
the batch number or it did not happen
comment on [Results] 6 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/vendorvetting · 216 points · 1 year ago
Order date, product, and result, in that order please?
comment on [Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 6 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · 14 points · 1 year ago
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
comment on [Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 6 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · -2 points · 1 year ago
Retitled to remove editorialising.
Adding to this: reship is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on anyone else notice wiki kicking in around week 29 in c/meta · 41 points · 1 year ago
the site talking about itself
comment on reship vs Medutest — genuinely asking which matters more in c/vendorvetting · 0 points · 2 years ago
Tested 22 batches from Homopeptide over 73 weeks. The consistency is the signal. They claim 98, they deliver 98.
comment on [Discussion] rules is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/meta · 25 points · 2 years ago
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
comment on [Discussion] rules is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/meta · 13 points · 2 years ago
sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly
comment on unpopular opinion: reship is massively overrated in c/vendorvetting · 0 points · 2 years ago
Order date, product, and result, in that order please?