GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] can we stop arguing about moderation until somebody posts a number — 36 comments in the full submission. View in context.
851
c/meta·submitted 1 year ago by u/rekha_mwangi

[Discussion] can we stop arguing about moderation until somebody posts a number

Discussionbranch of 11 comments

Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 10mg, week 81, injection-site soreness present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — disclosure — and tracked it for 15 weeks. Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else…

Read the full submission and all 36 comments →

This branch

11 comments, started 1 year ago
u/hub_opsMOD47 points·1 year ago

Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hassan_castellanos32 points·1 year ago

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kenji_demir10 points·1 year ago

the ranking formula is meta

replysharereportpermalink
u/dose_creep_dan13 points·1 year ago

I am going to push back on this slightly.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yusuf_achebe-10 points·1 year ago

Strongly agree. Transparency wins.

replysharereportpermalink
u/quiet_moderatormod1 point·1 year ago

the periodic argument about wiki standards

replysharereportpermalink
u/lucia_balogun5 points·1 year ago

moderation appeals go through modmail first

replysharereportpermalink
u/marit_mwangi3 points·1 year ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/vikram_mbeki19 points·1 year ago

Retitled to remove editorialising.

Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rekha_mwangiOP14 points·1 year ago

sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_petrescu27 points·1 year ago

rules, moderation, ranking, wiki

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →