does dead space actually matter or is it forum lore at this point
I have had 19 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 24 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
more water means more units for the same dose, which means finer resolution
Show the arithmetic. Where did the units come from?
30mg vial, 1mL water, concentration is 30/1 — write it on the vial afterwards
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
u-100 syringe, not u-40, or your math is off by factor of 10
Spent 22 weeks confused about concentration math until someone showed me the table. 30mg, 2mL, concentration is 30/2.
15mg vial, 2mL water, concentration is 15/2 — write it on the vial afterwards
Spent 22 weeks confused about concentration math until someone showed me the table.
Adding to this: mg/mL is doing more work than the comment implies.
bacteriostatic and sterile water are not interchangeable, do not use them that way
u-100 syringe, not u-40, or your math is off by factor of 22
u-100 syringe, not u-40, or your math is off by factor of 22
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 84 weeks to accept.
u-100 syringe, not u-40, or your math is off by factor of 22 Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 84 weeks to accept.
Disagree on that part. 98.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
[removed by moderator]
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
u-100 syringe, not u-40, or your math is off by factor of 20
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
i am begging people to write down the concentration
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
dead space is real and the syringe matters
dosing errors come from people reconstituting two vials differently and forgetting which is which
15mg vial, 2mL water, concentration is 15/2 — write it on the vial afterwards
swirl, do not shake, or you are courting oxidation
This is correct. 2mL versus 7mL is the common mistake.
- 1The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a…10 comments in this branch · started by u/britta_nakamura
- 2The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a…8 comments in this branch · started by u/aleksi_lehtinen