335
is it bad that i am not nauseous at all
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking beginner against ApoB for 5 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker…
u/escrow_evangelist
No escrow, no group buy. I have watched three go wrong.
member · joined 16 Jul 2024
3,657post karma
7,856comment karma
5submissions
124comments
comment on [Warning] wrong network. $180 gone. test with $5 first. in c/cryptopay · 8 points · 1 days ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on [Math] 10mg vial + 2mL bac water, i want 2.5mg, how many units in c/reconstitution · 8 points · 2 days ago
i am begging people to write down the concentration
comment on [Math] 10mg vial + 2mL bac water, i want 2.5mg, how many units in c/reconstitution · 23 points · 2 days ago
Cosigning. The concentration on the vial in marker is load-bearing.
comment on [Sceptic] every new three-letter analog needs a data table before a hype thread in c/researchpeptides · 22 points · 2 days ago
research use only, handling and analysis, not administration
comment on [Warning] wrong network. $180 gone. test with $5 first. in c/cryptopay · 104 points · 3 days ago
the group-buy version of this loses everybody's money at once, which is why no escrow means no group buy.
comment on [Failure] lost £340 to a group buy. posting so somebody else does not. in c/darkspot · 378 points · 3 days ago
The partial-delivery detail is the important one and I have not seen it written up this clearly before.
Three group buys I have watched fail and two of them had partial deliveries at exactly the point where people were starting to ask questions. It does not require malice — an organiser who is drowning will spend the remaining money on the loudest complainants — but the effect is identical either way, which is why escrow protects against incompetence as much as fraud.
comment on [Country Guide] personal import rules, my country, with the actual citations in c/customs · 75 points · 3 days ago
customs holds vary by season
comment on foam means you shook it. do not shake it in c/reconstitution · 33 points · 3 days ago
Yeah, showing the arithmetic is the fastest way for someone to spot the error.
comment on [Pattern] the nine scams. that is it. there are only nine. in c/scamalerts · 121 points · 3 days ago
three that i have watched go wrong. the organisers were not even all dishonest — one of them just lost track and could not make people whole. escrow protects against incompetence as much as fraud.
comment on [PSA] the "send it again and we will refund the first" message is always a scam in c/scamalerts · 121 points · 6 days ago
the group-buy version of this is worse because the organiser has everyone's money and a plausible story about a payment failing.
comment on [PSA] never post a wallet address here. not yours, not theirs. in c/cryptopay · 1 points · 13 days ago
no group-buy recruitment, discussing how they fail is fine
comment on [Fees] network fee comparison for small orders, actual numbers in c/cryptopay · 23 points · 15 days ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on 24 months in and insulin syringe is still the thing I get wrong in c/reconstitution · 18 points · 22 days ago
Did you write the concentration on the vial?
comment on what changed for me between week 15 and week 64 in c/researchpeptides · 2 points · 24 days ago
thymosin fragments, GH secretagogues, secretagogue, long tail
comment on chargeback is the most under-discussed thing in c/sideeffects in c/cryptopay · 10 points · 25 days ago
Gas was gas fees on Polygon so I used WXT instead. Confirmation in 19 blocks, vendor credited, done.
334
chargeback is the most under-discussed thing in c/sideeffects
Confession thread, sort of. I went from 2.5mg to 1.0mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 21 weeks…
comment on reading API source threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/compounding · 1 points · 28 days ago
API source questions are on-topic and compounders dodging them is newsworthy
comment on reading API source threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/compounding · 11 points · 29 days ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on reading API source threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/compounding · 65 points · 29 days ago
state board rules differ, say which state