GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Results] 2 weeks, 6kg, and retatrutide was the hard part — 47 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.3k
c/retatrutide·submitted 21 days ago by u/honest_syringe33

[Results] 2 weeks, 6kg, and retatrutide was the hard part

Resultsbranch of 11 comments

phase 2. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/glp1canada is downstream of it. Titration speed, reflux, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort phase 2 out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 23 months. My ApoB was the…

Read the full submission and all 47 comments →

This branch

11 comments, started 20 days ago
u/yusuf_ramos94 points·20 days ago·edited

triple agonism is phase 2, do not generalise

replysharereportpermalink
u/nadia_norgaard53 points·20 days ago

The heart rate signal in TRIUMPH is real and concerning. Higher doses had higher mean HR changes.

replysharereportpermalink
u/signe_villalobos37 points·20 days ago

This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.

replysharereportpermalink
u/careful_gradient_again22 points·19 days ago

nobody should be giving this to anyone without extensive monitoring

replysharereportpermalink
u/freya_baptista12 points·19 days ago

Not to be pedantic but glucagon and triple agonist are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

replysharereportpermalink
u/reflux_report6 points·19 days ago

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

replysharereportpermalink
u/iman_castellanos17 points·19 days ago

triple agonism is dose escalation, do not generalise

replysharereportpermalink
u/yara_lindholm4 points·18 days ago

This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bilal_osei12 points·19 days ago·edited

phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial

replysharereportpermalink
u/clara_weiss63 points·20 days ago

The heart rate signal in TRIUMPH is real and concerning.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nabila_bakken33 points·19 days ago

the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/retatrutide

Retatrutide: GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonism, the TRIUMPH programme, and the fact that most people discussing it are handling research-grade material with no human-use approval anywhere. Dose-response, heart-rate signal, and the unusually steep phase-2 weight curves get argued about here weekly.

65kmembers
130submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/retatrutide rules
  1. Retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use. Posts must not read as usage instructions.
  2. Phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers. Cite the trial and the dose arm.
  3. Heart-rate and dose-escalation reports need actual measurements, not impressions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.