am I the only one who found test results harder than the injections
Quick one. Canada here.
below spec works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US.
Specifics: the route I used took 5 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost. The thing that would have saved me the most time was knowing which document to ask for at the start.
Happy to answer questions from anyone in the same jurisdiction.
best — the order this archive was captured in
I am going to push back on this slightly.
[deleted]
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
inter-lab variance is real, 4 points is inside normal
multiple batches from QYB show a spread, that is the data
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
the Janoshik and VendorInvestigate results differ by 19 points, both inside inter-lab variance
the Janoshik and VendorInvestigate results differ by 19 points, both inside inter-lab variance
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 38 weeks to accept.
Was that the vendor COA or your own test?
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
Is that 93.7% area or mass?
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
inter-lab variance is real, 17 points is inside normal
the 98.4% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
the 98.4% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
Adding to this: purity is doing more work than the comment implies.
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
Mechanistically the bit that matters is below spec. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
Mechanistically the bit that matters is below spec.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 15 weeks to accept.
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
QST / BPC / batch 3 / VendorInvestigate / 93.7% — that is the shape
- 1I am going to push back on this slightly.10 comments in this branch · started by u/noor_vermeulen
- 2Is that 93.7% area or mass?9 comments in this branch · started by u/valeria_girard