1.5k
am I the only one who found test results harder than the injections
Quick one. Canada here. below spec works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given…
u/thandi_solberg
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Groningen.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
9,296post karma
3,582comment karma
4submissions
45comments
comment on [Caution] stacking with a sulfonylurea is a real hypo risk, not a theoretical one in c/t2dglp1 · 19 points · 1 days ago
the 56 A1c trend is the answer
comment on [Question] metformin alongside — keep it or drop it in c/t2dglp1 · 10 points · 5 days ago
the 2 A1c trend is the answer
comment on [Lab] identity confirmed but net peptide content was 71% in c/bpc157 · 23 points · 15 days ago
What are you comparing it against though?
comment on [Below Spec] 88% is not "basically fine" and i am tired of that reply in c/labresults · 1 points · 21 days ago
the 97.9% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
comment on [Lab] four vendors, same compound, same week, one test each in c/labresults · 1 points · 1 months ago
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
comment on regulatory is the most under-discussed thing in c/meta in c/bpc157 · 6 points · 2 months ago
research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about Janoshik in c/labresults · 602 points · 2 months ago
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
comment on [Results] 51 weeks on 2.4mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/t2dglp1 · 45 points · 3 months ago
the ferritin change is the signal
comment on [Results] 51 weeks on 2.4mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/t2dglp1 · 33 points · 3 months ago
glycaemic control first, that is the original indication
comment on Medutest — 2 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/labresults · 27 points · 3 months ago
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
comment on am I the only one who found test results harder than the injections in c/labresults · 61 points · 3 months ago
inter-lab variance is real, 4 points is inside normal
comment on batch vs test results — genuinely asking which matters more in c/labresults · 25 points · 5 months ago
HJ / BPC / batch 4 / VendorInvestigate / 99.0% — that is the shape
comment on genuine question about regret that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/darkspot · 5 points · 6 months ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on the purity thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/labresults · 22 points · 6 months ago
The PeptideMeter result at 96.2% was below the 96.8% claim. GGPeps retested at their cost and came back 96.2%. Logged as resolved.
comment on the purity thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/labresults · 7 points · 6 months ago
My VendorInvestigate result matched the vendor COA exactly, which is rare. GGPeps deserves that note in the directory.
comment on the purity thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/labresults · 95 points · 6 months ago
ERP claimed 99.2%, Medutest came back 96.8%. 22 points is inter-lab variance, no drama.
comment on the purity thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/labresults · 130 points · 6 months ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
3.1k
the purity thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down
Week 37 update. 13kg down from the start, muscle cramps basically gone since about week 89. Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I…
comment on three years of test results threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/labresults · 0 points · 6 months ago
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.