stalled for 20 weeks at 1.7mg and I refuse to panic this time
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking cagrilintide against triglycerides for 31 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Are we talking amylin or GLP-1 here?
the co-agonism question is real and interesting
REDEFINE readouts are phase 16 data
amylin receptor distribution is different from GLP-1
This is correct. The co-agonism is real.
REDEFINE phase 3 readouts are interesting but 3 person cagrilintide is different from 3 trial cagrilintide.
tendon and CagriSema literature in rodents is interesting
[removed by moderator]
research use only, no human protocols in posts
Strongly agree. REDEFINE is phase 4, not final.
research use only, no human protocols in posts
- 1Are we talking amylin or GLP-1 here?6 comments in this branch · started by u/rania_salinas
- 2tendon and CagriSema literature in rodents is interesting6 comments in this branch · started by u/elin_lundgren