109
[Question] protein target in g/kg — of current weight or goal weight
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking lean mass against ApoB for 27 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker…
u/rania_salinas
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Nairobi.
member · joined 14 May 2025
2,547post karma
2,986comment karma
6submissions
68comments
comment on [Stats] relative risk reduction sells papers, absolute risk reduction makes decisions in c/trialwatch · 7 points · 3 days ago
Phase 2 TRIUMPH looked amazing. Phase 3 trials are harder. Do not anchor on phase 2 readouts.
comment on [Training] three full-body sessions a week through the whole cut in c/glp1muscle · 12 points · 4 days ago
Genuine question — what concentration were you at?
comment on [Question] protein target in g/kg — of current weight or goal weight in c/glp1muscle · 2 points · 7 days ago
no supplement selling, no coaching solicitation
comment on [Question] protein target in g/kg — of current weight or goal weight in c/glp1muscle · 3 points · 7 days ago
no supplement selling, no coaching solicitation
comment on [Question] how do you verify identity when there is no reference standard in c/researchpeptides · 2 points · 9 days ago
the research peptides literature is thin on humans
comment on [Question] how do you verify identity when there is no reference standard in c/researchpeptides · 3 points · 10 days ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Question] how do you verify identity when there is no reference standard in c/researchpeptides · 12 points · 10 days ago
Maintenance for 13 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.
comment on [Question] how do you verify identity when there is no reference standard in c/researchpeptides · 10 points · 10 days ago
evidence-level statements required: in vitro, rodent, or human
242
[Question] how do you verify identity when there is no reference standard
Been lurking in c/cagrilintide for about 2 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 61, 2.4mg, and secretagogue is the bit I still cannot…
comment on [Regret] i ignored the abdominal pain for four days in c/darkspot · 6 points · 14 days ago
What was the batch number and which service?
comment on [Paper] ATTAIN-1 — an oral pill with no food restrictions is a bigger deal than the % suggests in c/trialwatch · 16 points · 16 days ago
phase 2 is not phase 3, smaller n and shorter trial
comment on [Regret] told my whole family, then stopped, then had to tell them that too in c/darkspot · 0 points · 22 days ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on [Discussion] the sarcopenia question nobody funded properly in c/glp1muscle · 35 points · 23 days ago
rapid loss plus no protein equals muscle loss
comment on [Discussion] glucagon is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/survodutide · 5 points · 1 months ago
Not to be pedantic but MASH and glucagon are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify glucagon in c/survodutide · 11 points · 1 months ago
glucagon injection is a different vector than GLP-1
comment on [Failure] two years in, stopped for financial reasons, regained most of it in c/darkspot · 5 points · 1 months ago
Not to be pedantic but what went wrong and failure are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on stalled for 5 weeks at 2.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/cagrilintide · 44 points · 1 months ago
this is why i still read c/reconstitution
comment on small win: TRIUMPH stopped being a problem at week 15 in c/trialwatch · 42 points · 2 months ago
event rates are more informative than hazard ratios alone
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about sarcopenia in c/glp1muscle · 1 points · 2 months ago
This is correct. DEXA is the standard.