u/meera_sandvik
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Mombasa.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Comments — page 4 of 5
comment on France: survodutide, and what it actually costs here in c/survodutide · 10 points · 1 year ago
the MASH indication changes the risk calculus
comment on switched from 1.7mg to 1.0mg and the fatigue got better, not worse in c/coa · 1 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring packaging at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coldchain · 126 points · 1 year ago
stability after excursion is not zero, it is dose-dependent
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for orforglipron posts in c/orforglipron · 52 points · 1 year ago
the absorption problem is solved by non-peptide structure
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for fraud posts in c/scamalerts · 65 points · 1 year ago
Can you post the Medutest result that shows the problem?
comment on milestone: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/progresspics · 26 points · 1 year ago
The injection-site soreness was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on what changed for me between week 95 and week 49 in c/labresults · 78 points · 1 year ago
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 0.5mg and the early fullness got better, not worse in c/labresults · -30 points · 1 year ago
multiple batches from WWB show a spread, that is the data
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring certificate of analysis at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 4 points · 1 year ago
the batch number or it did not happen
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
comment on am I the only one who found cold chain harder than the injections in c/coldchain · 6 points · 1 year ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify batch in c/labresults · -23 points · 1 year ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify batch in c/labresults · 284 points · 1 year ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
comment on does goal actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/progresspics · 82 points · 1 year ago
Crossposting this to c/bloodwork because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on is it normal to get nausea at week 30 in c/coldchain · 6 points · 1 year ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on genuine question about ATTAIN that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/orforglipron · 18 points · 1 year ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on Spain: batch, and what it actually costs here in c/coa · 32 points · 1 year ago
the batch number or it did not happen
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for dual agonist posts in c/survodutide · 10 points · 1 year ago
do not generalise from tirzepatide
comment on someone explain progress to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/progresspics · 28 points · 1 year ago
include timeframe and starting point or it is a brag with no info
comment on lyophilised vs stability — genuinely asking which matters more in c/coldchain · 101 points · 1 year ago
data logger is the standard, gut feeling is not
comment on [Discussion] the Medutest advice in here is 8 years out of date in c/labresults · 38 points · 1 year ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.