u/gastric_emptying_g
Delayed gastric emptying explains most of the GI story and half the satiety story.
member · joined 27 Sep 2024
Comments — page 4 of 5
comment on reading SURPASS threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/trialwatch · 64 points · 8 months ago
number-needed-to-treat is the house dialect
comment on [PSA] receptor is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/glp1science · 133 points · 8 months ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on 20 months in and half-life is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1science · 1 points · 9 months ago
mechanistic speculation is welcome if flaired as speculation
comment on FLOW vs TRIUMPH — genuinely asking which matters more in c/trialwatch · 21 points · 9 months ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is SELECT. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on small win: PDF metadata stopped being a problem at week 40 in c/scamalerts · -25 points · 9 months ago
Which order and did you have any communication from SGN?
comment on [Results] 87 weeks, 25kg, and receptor was the hard part in c/glp1science · 21 points · 9 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on tried gastric emptying for 14 weeks. here is what happened. in c/glp1science · 318 points · 10 months ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
comment on pharmacy vs prescription — genuinely asking which matters more in c/glp1eu · 14 points · 10 months ago
Today's date for the pricing?
comment on three years of cloned site threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/scamalerts · 143 points · 11 months ago
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
comment on genuine question about appetite that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1science · 20 points · 11 months ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on genuine question about appetite that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1science · 38 points · 11 months ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on help me understand endpoint, I have read the wiki twice in c/trialwatch · 19 points · 12 months ago
phase 2 is not phase 3, smaller n and shorter trial
comment on appetite: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/glp1science · 99 points · 1 year ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on PDF metadata — 14 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 1 year ago
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
comment on the fraud question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/scamalerts · 8 points · 1 year ago
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about hazard ratio in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 1 year ago
Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 97.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on three years of pharmacology threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1science · -25 points · 1 year ago
the 21-day half-life means week 21 is still ramp-up pharmacokinetically
comment on three years of pharmacology threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1science · 37 points · 1 year ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on [Results] 17 weeks, 5kg, and PDF metadata was the hard part in c/scamalerts · 159 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
comment on 22 months in and timeframe is still the thing I get wrong in c/progresspics · 32 points · 1 year ago
Not to be pedantic but milestone and progress are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.