u/gastric_emptying_g
Delayed gastric emptying explains most of the GI story and half the satiety story.
member · joined 27 Sep 2024
Comments — page 2 of 5
comment on why does nobody talk about hazard ratio in c/trialwatch · -35 points · 1 months ago
This is correct. Discontinuation arms show the regain reality.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring EMA at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/glp1eu · 2 points · 1 months ago
EMA notices are different from national ones
comment on [Results] 26 weeks on 15mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/glp1eu · 14 points · 1 months ago
comment on the fake COA thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/scamalerts · 21 points · 1 months ago
the BCH situation resolved, logged it here as resolved
comment on week 36 check-in — 11kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me in c/scamalerts · -1 points · 2 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on help me understand FLOW, I have read the wiki twice in c/trialwatch · 40 points · 2 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on Germany: water content, and what it actually costs here in c/coa · 35 points · 2 months ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on cloned site vs fake COA — genuinely asking which matters more in c/scamalerts · 2 points · 2 months ago
group buy exit scams follow a pattern
comment on SELECT: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/trialwatch · 58 points · 2 months ago
Is that absolute or relative risk reduction?
comment on help me understand appetite, I have read the wiki twice in c/glp1science · 15 points · 2 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on [Struggle] regained 6kg over a winter and i am posting it anyway in c/progresspics · 3 points · 2 months ago
the community is deliberately image-free
comment on [Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on COA in c/coa · 7 points · 2 months ago
chromatogram or it did not happen
comment on genuine question about incretin that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1science · 130 points · 2 months ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on 18 months in and TRIUMPH is still the thing I get wrong in c/trialwatch · 7 points · 2 months ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on am I the only one who found COA harder than the injections in c/coa · 106 points · 2 months ago
What were the related substances listed individually?
comment on [Vendor] QST order #10 — Spain, 31 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/glp1eu · 8 points · 3 months ago
private and public prescription routes differ
comment on help me understand fake COA, I have read the wiki twice in c/scamalerts · 7 points · 3 months ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on Canada: endpoint, and what it actually costs here in c/trialwatch · 68 points · 3 months ago
Strongly agree. Phase 2 is investigational, not conclusive.
comment on reading exit scam threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/scamalerts · 147 points · 3 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on [Results] 62 weeks, 45kg, and FLOW was the hard part in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 4 months ago
the 12 week readout is different from the 14 week readout
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.