GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
4.8k
c/scamalerts·posted 9 months ago by u/priya_palacios

small win: PDF metadata stopped being a problem at week 40

PSA Clean Column ×3 Cold Box ×2 Well Actually ×2

Right, the group buy question again, but with numbers this time.

I have 23 data points over 12 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.

The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 54, not week 8. People give up long before the interesting part.

Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.

18,760 up / 13,979 down57% upvoted38 commentsid rs6atp20 Oct 2025

38 comments

30 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/archived_thread_a579 points·9 months ago

Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nordic_pricing442 points·9 months ago

Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.

replysharereportpermalink
u/vikram_ferreira358 points·9 months ago

sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]144 points·9 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/halima_boateng115 points·9 months ago

Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyc/scamalerts268 points·9 months ago

the GL Biochem situation resolved, logged it here as resolved

replysharereportpermalink
u/divya_bakken116 points·9 months ago·edited

This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.

replysharereportpermalink
u/laila_yilmaz219 points·9 months ago·edited

reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations

replysharereportpermalink
u/rulebook_rachaelmod · c/meta48 points·9 months ago

Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lukas_delgado204 points·9 months ago

Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gastric_emptying_g-25 points·9 months ago

Which order and did you have any communication from SGN?

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_pires1 point·9 months ago

cloned storefronts use old images, search for those

replysharereportpermalink
u/vikram_ferreira1 point·9 months ago

This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.

replysharereportpermalink
u/swirl_dont_shakereconstitution163 points·9 months ago

Can you post the Medutest result that shows the problem?

replysharereportpermalink
u/priya_palaciosOP0 points·9 months ago

The MKM exit scam collected 9 orders and disappeared. Order ids 21 through 9 all silent.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tobias_barros0 points·9 months ago

the TFC situation resolved, logged it here as resolved

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyc/scamalerts1 point·9 months ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dilara_szabo1 point·9 months ago

I am going to push back on this slightly.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_osei1 point·9 months ago

fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance

replysharereportpermalink
u/priya_palaciosOP1 point·9 months ago

The Janoshik results I got back showed 98.9% but GGPeps claimed 94.2%. Same vial, two services. I posted the receipts.

replysharereportpermalink
u/zaid_eriksen110 points·9 months ago

reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations

replysharereportpermalink
u/santiago_rasmussen0 points·9 months ago

PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds

replysharereportpermalink
u/priya_palaciosOP1 point·9 months ago

PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 45 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/georgi_tamm1 point·9 months ago

Not to be pedantic but scam and group buy are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

replysharereportpermalink
u/long_post_larry1 point·9 months ago

evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test

replysharereportpermalink
u/nils_ferreira61 points·9 months ago
nope. mine was the opposite.
replysharereportpermalink
u/rohan_krastev31 points·9 months ago

This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.

replysharereportpermalink
u/farid_kuipers13 points·9 months ago

the TFC situation resolved, logged it here as resolved

replysharereportpermalink
u/ferran_dahlberg11 points·9 months ago

the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting

replysharereportpermalink
u/careful_gradient_notes12 points·9 months ago

Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.