GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of small win: PDF metadata stopped being a problem at week 40 — 38 comments in the full submission. View in context.
4.8k
c/scamalerts·submitted 9 months ago by u/priya_palacios

small win: PDF metadata stopped being a problem at week 40

PSAbranch of 8 comments

Right, the group buy question again, but with numbers this time. I have 23 data points over 12 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am…

Read the full submission and all 38 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 9 months ago
u/swirl_dont_shakereconstitution163 points·9 months ago

Can you post the Medutest result that shows the problem?

replysharereportpermalink
u/priya_palaciosOP0 points·9 months ago

The MKM exit scam collected 9 orders and disappeared. Order ids 21 through 9 all silent.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tobias_barros0 points·9 months ago

the TFC situation resolved, logged it here as resolved

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyc/scamalerts1 point·9 months ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dilara_szabo1 point·9 months ago

I am going to push back on this slightly.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_osei1 point·9 months ago

fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance

replysharereportpermalink
u/priya_palaciosOP1 point·9 months ago

The Janoshik results I got back showed 98.9% but GGPeps claimed 94.2%. Same vial, two services. I posted the receipts.

replysharereportpermalink
u/zaid_eriksen110 points·9 months ago

reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/scamalerts
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/scam_taxonomyu/coa_forgery_watchu/whois_wandau/sock_puppet_spotter
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →