unpopular opinion: reship is massively overrated
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 0.5mg, week 55, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — testing — and tracked it for 16 weeks. Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am…
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
Which service tested it and what did they come back with?
Order date, product, and result, in that order please?
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
Correct.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
How many orders from GL Biochem is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.