u/sofia_ferreira
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Rosario.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
comment on glucagon co-agonism has its own safety story, stop generalising from tirz in c/survodutide · 1 points · 3 days ago
Hepatic fat or MASH or what?
comment on glucagon co-agonism has its own safety story, stop generalising from tirz in c/survodutide · 3 points · 4 days ago
not approved, descriptive posts only
comment on [Win] approved after i sent them their own policy criteria back in c/insurancefights · 19 points · 8 days ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Discussion] small community, high signal, let us keep it that way in c/survodutide · 1 points · 9 days ago
phase 15 data is interesting, phase 30 will be different
comment on [Win] HSA dollars changed the real cost by a third and i nearly missed it in c/insurancefights · 87 points · 17 days ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on [Vendor] JEEP six orders in, zero problems, and i am suspicious of my own luck in c/vendorvetting · 3 points · 18 days ago
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
comment on [Vendor] JEEP six orders in, zero problems, and i am suspicious of my own luck in c/vendorvetting · 22 points · 18 days ago
Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?
comment on the sequence question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/bpc157 · 1 points · 24 days ago
handlers in the community are rare and cautious
comment on [Results] 47 weeks, 36kg, and SURPASS was the hard part in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 25 days ago
Small correction: the trial was 2 weeks, not 16. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [Vendor] TFC shipping got noticeably slower after March, anyone else in c/vendorvetting · 185 points · 27 days ago
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
comment on how do i tell an HPLC-UV COA from an LC-MS one at a glance in c/coa · 78 points · 27 days ago
Metadata check caught a COA that was created in a browser four months after the analysis date. Not evidence of fraud, but worth flagging to MKM.
comment on genuine question about SURMOUNT that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/trialwatch · 6 points · 28 days ago
dropout handling matters, especially on GI-heavy populations
comment on does step therapy actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/insurancefights · 6 points · 1 months ago
prior auth criteria are state-specific, external review differs
comment on someone explain PeptideMeter to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/vendorvetting · 5 points · 1 months ago
Yeah, QST took 24 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
comment on anyone else notice certificate of analysis kicking in around week 75 in c/coa · 4 points · 1 months ago
Cosigning.
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on help me understand FLOW, I have read the wiki twice in c/trialwatch · 9 points · 2 months ago
the 18 week readout is different from the 6 week readout
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about testing in c/vendorvetting · 13 points · 2 months ago
Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?
comment on someone explain step therapy to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/insurancefights · 14 points · 2 months ago
appeal letter templates are in the wiki
comment on am I the only one who found order records harder than the injections in c/vendorvetting · 93 points · 2 months ago
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
comment on [Question] rodent data — what am I missing here in c/bpc157 · 65 points · 2 months ago
tendon and rodent data literature in rodents is interesting