GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
11k
c/vendorvetting·posted 2 years ago by u/hassan_nilsen

Medutest — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right

PSA Clean Column ×7 Receipts ×3 Slow Clap ×1

Quick one. Canada here.

reship works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US.

Specifics: the route I used took 2 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost. The thing that would have saved me the most time was knowing which document to ask for at the start.

Happy to answer questions from anyone in the same jurisdiction.

42,460 up / 31,188 down58% upvoted58 commentsid bwua7z12 Feb 2024

58 comments

30 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/batch_number_bertievetting2.2k points·2 years ago·edited

referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions

replysharereportpermalink
u/paper_trail_paulavetting1k points·2 years ago
n=1 but same
replysharereportpermalink
u/milos_vestergaard815 points·2 years ago·edited

Reship experience: SWB asked for photos, processed it in 22 days, sent a replacement no questions. That is the template.

replysharereportpermalink
u/mod_cold_roommod · c/coldchain455 points·2 years ago

Small correction: the trial was 11 weeks, not 22. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ignacio_silva205 points·2 years ago

positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard

replysharereportpermalink
u/receipts_or_nothingvetting689 points·2 years ago·edited
this is the third time this week and i love it every time
replysharereportpermalink
u/freya_onwuka188 points·2 years ago

Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.

replysharereportpermalink
u/signe_villalobos89 points·2 years ago·edited

Correct.

Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hassan_nilsenOP52 points·2 years ago

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.

replysharereportpermalink
u/batch_number_bertieMOD488 points·2 years ago

This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]232 points·2 years ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_zielinski371 points·2 years ago

Yeah, ERP took 13 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bence_zielinski241 points·2 years ago

SGN order #9, Ireland, no drama, receipts inside

replysharereportpermalink
u/hassan_nilsenOP177 points·2 years ago

SGN order #9, Ireland, no drama, receipts inside

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tl_dr_tina122 points·2 years ago

referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions

replysharereportpermalink
u/step_count_stan60 points·2 years ago

Yeah, WXT took 13 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hassan_nilsenOP94 points·2 years ago

Which service tested it and what did they come back with?

replysharereportpermalink
u/milos_vestergaard282 points·2 years ago

Crossposting this to c/researchpeptides because the people who need it are not reading this community.

replysharereportpermalink
u/solene_eriksen160 points·2 years ago

Crossposting this to c/glp1muscle because the people who need it are not reading this community.

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_villalobos94 points·2 years ago

First order from QST was great, second one had a different batch and tested lower. The vendor retested and credited me. Logged it here.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rohan_krastev25 points·2 years ago

Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →
u/laila_almeida-22 points·2 years ago
post the spreadsheet
replysharereportpermalink
u/receipts_or_nothingvetting1 point·2 years ago

referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions

replysharereportpermalink
u/batch_number_bertievetting1 point·2 years ago

Not to be pedantic but Janoshik and VendorInvestigate are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

replysharereportpermalink
u/throwaway_titration70 points·2 years ago
controversial sort brought me here and it was worth it
replysharereportpermalink
u/dagny_ogunleye25 points·2 years ago

referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions

replysharereportpermalink
u/sofia_nascimento10 points·2 years ago

referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_osei3 points·2 years ago

JEEP order #22, Denmark, no drama, receipts inside

replysharereportpermalink
u/throwaway_titration18 points·2 years ago

referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.