11 months in and testing is still the thing I get wrong
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking vendor against eGFR for 27 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
WWB order #15, Sweden, no drama, receipts inside
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
the reship rate on TFC is actually pretty consistent
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 11–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
- 1did they reship, credit, or ghost you?6 comments in this branch · started by u/joaquin_petrov