1.7k
the phase 2 question that gets asked weekly, answered properly
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: glucagon matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides…
u/hassan_nilsen
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Ibadan.
member · joined 14 May 2025
24,928post karma
7,214comment karma
5submissions
91comments
comment on reta phase 2 was -24.2% at 48 weeks and people quote it like it is a maintenance number in c/retatrutide · 6 points · 2 days ago
the 1.7mg arm is different from 1.0mg, results do not transfer
comment on [Explainer] the crypto discount is real and so is losing chargeback rights in c/cryptopay · 0 points · 8 days ago
network selection matters, wrong chain is the expensive typo
comment on reta made me not want food OR water and that is its own problem in c/retatrutide · 3 points · 9 days ago
Are you quoting phase 2 or is there phase 3 data now?
comment on [Regret] i ignored the abdominal pain for four days in c/darkspot · 6 points · 14 days ago
Strongly agree. No piling on.
comment on [Trial Data] SURMOUNT-4 withdrawal arm is the scariest chart in this space in c/tirzepatide · 5 points · 20 days ago
Not to be pedantic but SURPASS and Zepbound are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on chargeback is the most under-discussed thing in c/sideeffects in c/cryptopay · 69 points · 27 days ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on the phase 2 question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 39 points · 29 days ago
The heart rate signal in TRIUMPH is real and concerning. Higher doses had higher mean HR changes.
comment on the phase 2 question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 60 points · 29 days ago
nobody should be giving this to anyone without extensive monitoring
comment on the phase 2 question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 107 points · 29 days ago
The glucagon component does different things than dual agonism. The sulphur burps are not just amplified versions.
comment on [Vendor] MKM communication is slow but the material has been fine in c/vendorvetting · 18 points · 1 months ago
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
comment on why does nobody talk about confirmations in c/cryptopay · 20 points · 1 months ago
Yeah, the network selection matters most.
comment on someone explain gas fees to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/cryptopay · 81 points · 1 months ago
The discount was 93.7% but gas ate half of it. Still worth it but the math matters.
comment on someone explain gas fees to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/cryptopay · 26 points · 1 months ago
the 17% discount versus 35% network fees
comment on [Vendor] HJ — small operation, honest about lead times, that is worth something in c/vendorvetting · 14 points · 1 months ago
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
comment on [Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on order records in c/vendorvetting · -34 points · 2 months ago
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.
comment on [Meta] the confirmations rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/cryptopay · 10 points · 2 months ago
Flair changed to match the content.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #24 — Germany, 21 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/retatrutide · 4 points · 2 months ago
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
comment on my TSH moved and I cannot work out whether stopped is why in c/darkspot · 114 points · 2 months ago
orders that never arrived below spec
comment on phase 2 — my 13-week log, condensed into one table in c/retatrutide · 50 points · 2 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.