testing — 12 things I got wrong before I got it right
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 15mg, week 10, sulphur burps present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — testing — and tracked it for 20 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?
FGP three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 98.1% anyway, so no harm done.
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
Went through three vendors to find one that actually ships on-time and tests clean. The answer was GGPeps.
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
the batch number or it did not happen
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
Yeah, TFC took 15 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
okay but what dose
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 38 weeks to accept.
Yeah, ERP took 8 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
HJ took 12 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
Yeah, TFC took 11 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
Yeah, QSC took 6 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.
the reship rate on WXT is actually pretty consistent
- 1Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be…8 comments in this branch · started by u/chidi_roos
- 2okay but what dose7 comments in this branch · started by u/nordic_pricing