GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
1.6k
c/vendorvetting·posted 1 year ago by u/ismael_pires

[Lab] SGN tirz — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2%

Lab Clean Column ×5 Sourced ×1

Genuinely asking, not being difficult.

Everyone in c/glp1muscle repeats that Medutest is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 4 threads of people agreeing with each other.

Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it has been repeated since 2023?

I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.

13,390 up / 11,783 down53% upvoted36 commentsid 69l7ce15 Mar 2025

36 comments

25 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/marta_vanhecke247 points·1 year ago

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_piresOP96 points·1 year ago

QYB three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 98.9% anyway, so no harm done.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]90 points·1 year ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/noor_cardoso191 points·1 year ago

Ordered from MKM, got the vial, tested it myself via VendorInvestigate, and it held the claim. Order fulfilled.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sig_figs_sammod · analytical72 points·1 year ago·edited

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rohan_krastev144 points·1 year ago

did they reship, credit, or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_almeida-18 points·1 year ago

receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_petrov1 point·1 year ago

Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ruben_brandt119 points·1 year ago

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nz_unfunded107 points·1 year ago

Order date, product, and result, in that order please?

replysharereportpermalink
u/gustav_vermeulen0 points·1 year ago

Small correction: the trial was 24 weeks, not 10. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rina_nascimento0 points·1 year ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gustav_vermeulen1 point·1 year ago

the PeptideMeter result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

replysharereportpermalink
u/kasper_cabrera44 points·1 year ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ruben_brandt65 points·1 year ago

the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

replysharereportpermalink
u/zaid_eriksen42 points·1 year ago

Is that a VendorInvestigate result or are you quoting the vendor COA?

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_pires61 points·1 year ago

one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread

replysharereportpermalink
u/mikkel_kimani27 points·1 year ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sofia_ferreira71 points·1 year ago

Went through three vendors to find one that actually ships on-time and tests clean. The answer was SSA.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_dziedzic54 points·1 year ago

Tested 22 batches from MKM over 88 weeks. The consistency is the signal. They claim 98, they deliver 98.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_piresOP21 points·1 year ago

SGN order #22, New Zealand, no drama, receipts inside

replysharereportpermalink
u/marit_sandvik19 points·1 year ago

Not to be pedantic but order records and PeptideMeter are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ghrp_history46 points·1 year ago

receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule

replysharereportpermalink
u/zofia_lindholm34 points·1 year ago

Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ledger_modmod · vetting23 points·1 year ago

order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.