GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] SGN tirz — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2% — 36 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.6k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 1 year ago by u/ismael_pires

[Lab] SGN tirz — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2%

Labbranch of 9 comments

Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/glp1muscle repeats that Medutest is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 4 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because…

Read the full submission and all 36 comments →

This branch

9 comments, started 1 year ago
u/nz_unfunded107 points·1 year ago

Order date, product, and result, in that order please?

replysharereportpermalink
u/gustav_vermeulen0 points·1 year ago

Small correction: the trial was 24 weeks, not 10. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rina_nascimento0 points·1 year ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gustav_vermeulen1 point·1 year ago

the PeptideMeter result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

replysharereportpermalink
u/kasper_cabrera44 points·1 year ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ruben_brandt65 points·1 year ago

the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

replysharereportpermalink
u/zaid_eriksen42 points·1 year ago

Is that a VendorInvestigate result or are you quoting the vendor COA?

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_pires61 points·1 year ago

one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread

replysharereportpermalink
u/mikkel_kimani27 points·1 year ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.