GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] SGN tirz — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2% — 36 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.6k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 1 year ago by u/ismael_pires

[Lab] SGN tirz — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2%

Labbranch of 8 comments

Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/glp1muscle repeats that Medutest is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 4 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because…

Read the full submission and all 36 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 1 year ago
u/marta_vanhecke247 points·1 year ago

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_piresOP96 points·1 year ago

QYB three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 98.9% anyway, so no harm done.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]90 points·1 year ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/noor_cardoso191 points·1 year ago

Ordered from MKM, got the vial, tested it myself via VendorInvestigate, and it held the claim. Order fulfilled.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sig_figs_sammod · analytical72 points·1 year ago·edited

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rohan_krastev144 points·1 year ago

did they reship, credit, or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_almeida-18 points·1 year ago

receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_petrov1 point·1 year ago

Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.