VendorInvestigate: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1
Confession thread, sort of. I went from 15mg to 7.5mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 22 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway. So now I have early…
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
MKM three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 98.3% anyway, so no harm done.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
TFC took 23 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
Correct.
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
[deleted]
GL Biochem took 12 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard