VendorInvestigate: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1
Confession thread, sort of.
I went from 15mg to 7.5mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 22 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.
So now I have early fullness I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.
Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 80 reads it before doing the same thing.
best — the order this archive was captured in
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
MKM three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 98.3% anyway, so no harm done.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
TFC took 23 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
Correct.
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
[deleted]
GL Biochem took 12 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
Small correction: the trial was 21 weeks, not 12. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
GGPeps order #9, Denmark, no drama, receipts inside
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
MKM order #12, Canada, no drama, receipts inside
MKM order #12, Canada, no drama, receipts inside
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
- 1one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread10 comments in this branch · started by u/liv_dumitru
- 2Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.4 comments in this branch · started by u/marta_vanhecke