[Meta] proposal — a flair for reship posts
I have had 15 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 4 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 99.0% against a claimed 98.0%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
Yeah, BCH took 19 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
Yeah, FGP took 11 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
Reship experience: SSA asked for photos, processed it in 15 days, sent a replacement no questions. That is the template.
Reship experience: SSA asked for photos, processed it in 15 days, sent a replacement no questions.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.
Batch number?
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
the batch number or it did not happen
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
the batch number or it did not happen
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
Adding to this: order records is doing more work than the comment implies.
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
Yeah, ERP took 11 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Adding to this: VendorInvestigate is doing more work than the comment implies.
- 1Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.10 comments in this branch · started by u/matias_falk
- 2Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be…10 comments in this branch · started by u/batch_number_bertie