[Vendor] MKM communication is slow but the material has been fine
Genuinely asking, not being difficult.
Everyone in c/glp1muscle repeats that Medutest is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 18 threads of people agreeing with each other.
Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it has been repeated since 2023?
I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.
best — the order this archive was captured in
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
Order date, product, and result, in that order please?
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
Which service tested it and what did they come back with?
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Is that a Medutest result or are you quoting the vendor COA?
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
Retitled to remove editorialising.
Adding to this: VendorInvestigate is doing more work than the comment implies.
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
Retitled to remove editorialising.
Disagree on that part. 98.6% and 98.7% on the same vial is normal.
Went through three vendors to find one that actually ships on-time and tests clean. The answer was SWB.
Reship, credit, or they ghosted you? That matters.
the reship rate on WWB is actually pretty consistent
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 4–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
Yeah, CPC took 21 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
Slight fix: the number was 97.4, not 97.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Not to be pedantic but Janoshik and VendorInvestigate are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
- 1The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a…10 comments in this branch · started by u/lane_map_larry
- 2I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry…9 comments in this branch · started by u/ruben_brandt