Denmark: hypoglycaemia, and what it actually costs here
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: CGM matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 7 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 15 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
What are you comparing it against though?
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
the ApoB change is the signal
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in Germany.
the 73 A1c trend is the answer
the 73 A1c trend is the answer
Adding to this: A1c is doing more work than the comment implies.
no medication-stopping advice, ever
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
CGM traces tell a story, numbers alone do not
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
- 1Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.4 comments in this branch · started by u/wanjiru_osei