[Results] 61 weeks on 2.4mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring
Quick one. Canada here.
glucagon works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US.
Specifics: the route I used took 4 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost. The thing that would have saved me the most time was knowing which document to ask for at the start.
Happy to answer questions from anyone in the same jurisdiction.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols
TRIUMPH phase 2 showed 99.0% weight loss but the nausea profile on the highest arm was rough. Phase 2 != phase 3.
Which trial arm and what was the n?
heart rate and dose escalation need actual measurements, not impressions
the 1.7mg arm is different from 2.4mg, results do not transfer
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
Disagree on that part. 98.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy
Research use material only, no human-use approval anywhere. Posts must describe what happened, not instruct strangers.
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
- 1Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3…5 comments in this branch · started by u/yannick_salinas