week 56 check-in — 46kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me
I have had 21 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 22 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
[removed by moderator]
retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual
the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
The glucagon component does different things than dual agonism. The nausea are not just amplified versions.
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
Did you actually measure heart rate or is that a feeling?
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
TRIUMPH phase 2 showed 98.0% weight loss but the fatigue profile on the highest arm was rough. Phase 2 != phase 3.
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
Slight fix: the number was 99.3, not 93.7. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
TRIUMPH phase 2 showed 99.0% weight loss but the reflux profile on the highest arm was rough. Phase 2 != phase 3.
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 98.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 98.1.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 58 weeks to accept.
The glucagon component does different things than dual agonism. The fatigue are not just amplified versions.
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
nobody should be giving this to anyone without extensive monitoring
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
- 1Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3…11 comments in this branch · started by u/careful_gradient_again
- 2genuinely useful, thanks10 comments in this branch · started by u/vito_beaulieu